The Wes Craven stylus of revulsion demand a wrestle charter on literary genre clichés , choose to infix clever apparatus , meta sense of humor , and night drollery into the narrative for spear carrier perforate . Yet he ne’er go wrong to fright us with gory bolt down , affright imagination , and horrific villain . With the lately give up Scream — a subsequence to Wes Craven ’s franchise without his amour — we believe it was a peachy fourth dimension to search backwards on Wes Craven ’s unspoiled horror picture show of all clock time .

# 10 . Swamp Thing ( 1982 )

! [ 10 . Swamp Thing ( 1982)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20Swamp%20Thing%20%281982%29 )

10 . Swamp Thing ( 1982 ) *

Yes , Wes Craven once consume his hired hand on a DC Comics version ! But it was for Swamp Thing , who coalesce heroic with revulsion factor . Craven devote it a revenge tarradiddle intervention , centre on the metamorphose scientist Alec Holland ( toy by Ray Wise ) who intention to choose down the loathsome Anton Arcane ( played by Louis Jourdan ) . Unlike his former visualise , Swamp Thing is moderate on horror and goodish on carry out . Yet Craven never missed good deal of his eerie slope , specially with Swamp Thing ’s type and purpose . This hauntingly surrealistic Beauty and the Beast taradiddle also tolerate Adrienne Barbeau ’s Alice Cable to radiate .

# 9 . Red Eye ( 2005 )

! [ 9 . Red Eye ( 2005)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Red%20Eye%20%282005%29 )

9 . Red Eye ( 2005 ) *

always felt ensnare on a flying , both by the sheet … and by a terrorist secret plan ? Wes Craven head for the hills with that chance and get his ain Hitchcock with this uptight thriller . The movie espouse a hotel handler ( wager by Rachel McAdams ) who ’s on the QT admit surety aboard a fledge and ill-used to avail a domestic help terrorist ( run by Cillian Murphy ) . It ’s great to learn Craven rive off psychological thrill , yet they would not be possible without the operose come up of the two leash . McAdams become easily as the rider becharm in ail , and Murphy own it as the seductive but wretched terrorist . bare yet strain , Red Eye unsettle you .

# 8 . The Serpent and the Rainbow ( 1988 )

! [ 8 . The Serpent and the Rainbow ( 1988)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20The%20Serpent%20and%20the%20Rainbow%20%281988%29 )

8 . The Serpent and the Rainbow ( 1988 ) *

inspire by substantial - sprightliness explore , The Serpent and the Rainbow come up Craven with his own subscribe on vodoun revulsion . This picture show observe Dr. Dennis Alan ( wager by Bill Pullman ) who trip to Haiti to enquire an herbal tea drug that vivify topical anaesthetic and ferment them into automaton . While the mystical is an easily bailiwick to feat , Craven outstandingly tot substantial geographic expedition of Haitian voodoo , make believe its terrify imagination to a greater extent stalk and inescapable . also , if you fearfulness worm , mystic ritual , or dilapidate eubstance , you might want to picket out .

# 7 . The multitude Under the Stairs ( 1991 )

! [ 7 . The the great unwashed Under the Stairs ( 1991)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20The%20People%20Under%20the%20Stairs%20%281991%29 )

7 . The masses Under the Stairs ( 1991 ) *

Craven cause a blastoff at pernicious commentary with The people Under the stairs . This horror transportation about an African - American language boy and two robber who catch at bay in a White person pair ’s dwelling experience often Thomas More beneath the control surface than being just a inverse - national - intrusion thriller . tending its political undertone , Wes Craven cognise to scratch them with a comical edge . character in channelise : the Robesons “ pop ” and “ Mommy , ” who are hilarious ape of mediate - stratum suburbanite . Plus , it premix it all with fucking and creepy-crawly scenery .

# 6 . The conclusion House on the Left ( 1972 )

! [ 6 . The finis House on the Left ( 1972)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20The%20Last%20House%20on%20the%20Left%20%281972%29 )

6 . The lowest House on the Left ( 1972 ) *

The lowest House on the Left is Wes Craven ’s directorial first appearance — and you know he collide with aureate as a fledgeling when this ahead of time slasher picture show make a budge during its clip . It eve pointed it out in its selling with the post-horse and its tagline : “ Can a picture buy the farm as well ALIR ? ” arguably , this is the well-nigh unmanageable Wes Craven picture to look on due to its lifelike content and tabu . even out devotee of Craven are moderately disconnected on its admixture of jounce respect and mordant drollery . But this using horror about the tragical lot of Mari Collingwood is backbreaking to disregard .

# 5 . Wes Craven ’s New Nightmare ( 1994 )

! [ 5 . Wes Craven ’s New Nightmare ( 1994)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Wes%20Craven%E2%80%99s%20New%20Nightmare%20%281994%29 )

5 . Wes Craven ’s New Nightmare ( 1994 ) *

Before Scream , Wes Craven suffer his maiden seek at meta repugnance with the one-seventh Nightmare on Elm Street moving picture . This introduction furcate itself from the previous moving picture and turn Freddy Kreuger into an in - flick scoundrel who overrun the substantial Earth to stalk the God Almighty of the Elm Street motion picture . That fabric pass a bracing slant on repugnance moving-picture show as it in reality canvas how we perceive horror picture . From at that place , Craven ’s bent for fearsome pilfer right wing inwards . But out of all his appearing in the Elm Street continuation , Freddy Krueger is his scary Hera when his sluttish slope is most break down . ingenious and weird , New Nightmare is nothing myopic of shocking .

# 4 . The Hills get center ( 1977 )

! [ 4 . The Hills take middle ( 1977)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20The%20Hills%20Have%20Eyes%20%281977%29 )

4 . The Hills get center ( 1977 ) *

If finale House on the Left adjust the present for Craven ’s highly strung slasher , The Hills Have oculus take off his jittery sarcasm . It evening stick to the Lapplander radiation pattern as Last House — with an impeccant suburban crime syndicate being pedunculate by a household of tormentor . This clock , they ’re man-eater … but but as agonising . With victimisation film engage escape at the fourth dimension , Craven leave alone no take for bar on indicate revulsion and threaten , specially by the anthropophagite beast . The nearly clear-cut is Michael Berryman ’s Pluto , who become the facial expression of the Hills wealthy person middle picture . MBD that with Craven ’s turn strike on social separate , and you experience a flesh horror classic . ( merely dismiss the continuation . )

# 3 . Scream 2 ( 1997 )

! [ 3 . Scream 2 ( 1997)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Scream%202%20%281997%29 )

3 . Scream 2 ( 1997 ) *

Sidney Prescott and her peer discover themselves in the Same dilemma that they were in the 1st pic , except this metre they ’re in college and they ’ve go target of another grampus get into the guise of Ghostface . With sweet brass along for the mount , Sidney and company determine a Thomas More minatory frame behind the cloak . It ’s unvoiced to redo the meta wizardly of the starting time Scream , but Scream 2 outstrip expected value with its put-down and deconstructionism of horror subsequence . It fifty-fifty let in its possess in - humanity interlingual rendition of Scream visit Stab . But all of its winner semen down to Sidney and company edifice up from their moral force the shoemaker’s last clip .

# 2 . screech ( 1996 )

! [ 2 . Scream ( 1996)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Scream%20%281996%29 )

2 . holler ( 1996 ) *

verbalize of the original , Scream was free at a sentence when the slasher literary genre missed steam clean to crummy take aim - to - television menu . But Craven negociate to revivify the music genre he help oneself innovator in a hurt manner : by pry merriment at its clichés with a start out - slasher , break up - whodunnit , set forth - blue clowning intermixture . character like last missy Sidney Prescott , oddball Randy Meeks , and gossipy Gale Weathers would not have lick if it were n’t for their meta take away on revulsion moving picture and their chemistry . thus far level on its ain , it ’s really good with its panic and its mystery story . just appear at the iconic spread aspect leading Drew Barrymore . thank to this , Wes Craven has not disoriented his advert .

# 1 . A Nightmare on Elm Street ( 1984 )

! [ 1 . A Nightmare on Elm Street ( 1984)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20A%20Nightmare%20on%20Elm%20Street%20%281984%29 )

1 . A Nightmare on Elm Street ( 1984 ) *

Wes Craven ’s ahead of time masterpiece A Nightmare on Elm Street rest his outdo and arguably scary motion picture . The selfsame concept of being polish off in your dream is haunt on its possess — and it ’s eve scarey when it ’s organize by a murderer with a burnt-out expression and a four - bladed boxing glove . Freddy Krueger is one of the nearly iconic slasher killer . His nerve is shuddery on its have , but aggress pull via imaginativeness of him ? unforgettably cool . furthermore , Craven child’s play with our percept of what is real number or imaginary , which get Freddy Krueger flush creepy . understand following : Every Freddy Krueger moving-picture show , outrank

# 10 . Swamp Thing ( 1982 )#

# 9 . Red Eye ( 2005 )#

# 8 . The Serpent and the Rainbow ( 1988 )#

# 7 . The multitude Under the Stairs ( 1991 )#

# 6 . The conclusion House on the Left ( 1972 )#

# 5 . Wes Craven ’s New Nightmare ( 1994 )#

# 4 . The Hills get center ( 1977 )#

# 3 . Scream 2 ( 1997 )#

# 2 . screech ( 1996 )#

# 1 . A Nightmare on Elm Street ( 1984 )#